Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Monday, May 7, 2012
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Superhero Project: 4 Film Prep
- Who will be responsible for bringing the camera each time and who will bring the backup camera
- What creative costumes/clothing and props you did or will bring for the film
- Which three categories you will film for your Master Shots & the specific names of the Master Shot you signed up for
- Describe in a phrase or two an example of how your film will be both funny and unpredictable
- Super List (copied from the email sent by the group leader)
- Camera: Helen brings main camera; Shin brings backup camera
- Clothing & Props: for my part, I will bring a camera, and a giant pen (journalist effect), sunglasses, a bright-colored hoodie to stand out, and a notebook for jotting things in
- Master Shot Categories: discovery, dramatic shift, and conflict
- Name of the visual effect file you will use: atmosphere visual effect
- Humorous: when they look at tattoos and see that it's a very immature childish one
- Super List:
- Eye Line (shin-anytime)
- Low Angle (shin-when Ninsi trips)
- High Angle (helen-for the falling pencil and shin catching it)
- Ariel Angle (helen-for the tattoo)
- Dutch (jessi-for the chase scene)
- Long Shot (shin-beginning for establishing?)
- Medium Shot (jessi-anytime)
- Close Up Shot (jessi-anytime)
- Extremely Close Up Shot (helen-for the tattoo)
Action Shots
- Establishing Shot (shin-in the beginning)
- Tracking Shot (shin-for going down the hill)
- Head on Shot (shin)
- Reverse Shot (conversation) (helen -for the argument)
- Vertical Pan (jessi)
- Horizontal Pan (shin)
- Point of View (jessi)
- Swish Pan (helen)
- Arc Shot (helen-time freeze and like spin around)
Cuts
- Cutaway (helen)
- Reaction (shin)
- Jump Cut (jessi)
- Cross Cut (helen)
- Object Match Cut (jessi)
- Full Screen Match Cut (helen)
- Action Match Cut (jessi)
- Action Cut (shin)
- Progressive (shin)
- Cutting Rhythm (jessi)
Effects
- FLYING (jessi-for the chase scene-shin can fly)
- TIME FREEZE (helen)
- CLONE (jessi)
- JUMPER (shin)
Master Shots
- FIGHTING (jessi) don't make it very violent, make it "slap-stick" humor style of fighting (e.g. Tom & Jerry)
- CHASING (jessi)
- SUSPENSE (shin)
- DISCOVERY (helen)
- CONFLICT (helen)
- DIALOG (shin)
- ENTRANTS & EXITS (shin)
- DRAMATIC SHIFT (helen)
- DIRECTING ATTENTION (jessi)
Monday, April 23, 2012
Sunday, April 22, 2012
Superhero Project: 1
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Monday, April 16, 2012
AE Tutorial: 5 Handwriting
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Tasks: 4.1d
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Task: 1a
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Film Project: CP.7
Friday, February 10, 2012
Tasks: 3.3a
PSA Topic: Alcohol
First narrative line of text: When you drink too much alcohol, you won't be able to walk straight.
[A: low angle, S: tracking medium shot] Fourth line: When you break your wrist, you won't be able to open your chocolate.
[A: aerial view, S: over the shoulder medium shot, then to extreme closeup shot] Fifth line: When you can't open your chocolate, you will be hungry.
[A: high, S: tracking long shot, then to tracking medium shot] Sixth line: When you are hungry, you will starve to death.
[A: eye-level, S: swish pan closeup] Conclusion: "Don't starve to death, please drink less."
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Tasks: 3.3a
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Film Project: CP.5
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
S-telling Tutorial: Elements
Character
Explain your main Character Arc:
- How you will use Peeling the Onion:
- Establishing Universal Empathy (use two out of the five ways to show empathy for your main character:)
- Protagonist: (round or flat, dynamic or static)
- Antagonist: (round or flat, dynamic or static)
- Minor character: (round or flat, dynamic or static)
Conflict
- Tension (who/what will be involved? explain)
- Character Lock (change internally or externally? explain)
- Forced Action (explain)
- High & Low Stakes (explain)
Plants & Payoffs
- What information will you plant throughout the film that the viewer will have to figure out by the end?
- What will be the film's throughline?
Plot
- Explain the catalyst of your film
- What will be the biggest conflict?
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Sundance 2012: Those Lusterless Celebrity Documentaries
I’m always leery about documentaries made by celebrities. I’m not talking about people who are celebrities because of the docs — the Moores, Burnses and scant others who have name recognition because of their work — but rather the famous who jump in seemingly out of nowhere to make documentary films.
With Sundance 2012 bringing us the premiere this week of Ice-T’s Something From Nothing: The Art of Rap, and Rory Kennedy’s documentary about her also not un-famous mother Ethel, I find myself with that vaguely sickening feeling that celebrities make documentaries because they are burnishing self-image, protecting or enhancing their brand, or sometimes doing a salvage job. Think Al Gore. Or Exit Through Gift Shop, 2010 Sundance pick that a) may not have been factually accurate, and b) did more to build the artist Banksy’s brand than all of his previous work, but, most terribly, c) probably inspired a string of maybe-not-so-true-true-story docs.
Sundance has always been a strange marriage, combining Robert Redford’s star power with a love of the independent and obscure doing good work. Sundance programmers could argue that the decision to screen celebrity docs is part of its diversification, with stars bringing one kind of attention, while the festival legitimately launches the careers of a handful of lesser-known (and more worthy) filmmakers. Buzz, it would seem, is the tide upon which all boats rise.
Documentary is likewise a marriage between art and something akin to the journalistic. But, and maybe it’s because of my own background in journalism, I lean toward the work of people who don’t make films about themselves, who explore a topic of consequence and who stay behind the camera.
I realize the horse left the barn two decades ago in the substantial form of Michael Moore. Seeing a filmmaker squarely in the frame was not new when Moore first appeared in Roger & Me, but it had never been done so successfully. While that begat people like Morgan Spurlock vomiting McDonald’s out his car window, it also brought the curious Sketches of Frank Gehry, in which the famous architect was profiled by his famous friend, Sydney Pollack. The shots of the longtime feature-film director Pollack (a man with armies of film crews at his beck and call) shooting Gehry handheld, while himself being shot by a presumed film crew, stay with me.
Too many celebrity documentaries are marked by the filmmaker spending more time in front of the camera than behind it, rarely asking very involved questions, instead offering their mediations on a topic, and at times emitting a whiff of rank self-promotion. When I hear of Johnny Depp making a documentary about Keith Richards, I don’t expect any closure on questions left unanswered by Richards’ own generally forthcoming autobiography (although Keith may well repeat his assertions about Mick Jagger’s genitalia).
Beware documentaries that try too nakedly to lure star power. Tabloid fixture Lindsay Lohan signed on for a 2010 BBC documentary on child trafficking, delicately entitled Lindsay Lohan’s Indian Journey, a film that was pitched as Lohan “investigating” the topic. Who could take it seriously? The film was greeted with shock, and disastrous ratings. Lohan, apparently unscathed, was back partying in LA in no time.
Celebrity docs may have hit their most egregious with the comedian Chris Rock’s Good Hair. Rock invited documentarian Regina Kimbell to screen her film about African-American hairstyles, My Nappy Roots. Some time later he came forward with his own documentary, not only on the same topic, but also sharing many elements with Kimbell’s film. She lost a lawsuit against him, but that doesn’t mean she didn’t have every right to see his effort as piggybacking on hers. The comparison between the films is, to me, chilling.
Second on my list may be William Shatner’s The Captains, a documentary about playing the captain on TV’s “Star Trek.” The New York Times‘ Mike Hale’s dutiful review of the film is far better than the film itself: “Much of the fun of watching The Captains is waiting to see just how shameless a huckster and self-promoter Mr. Shatner can be. You don’t have to wait long.”
Taking the bronze is a yet-to-be-completed Juliette Lewis documentary, which makes the podium based simply on headlines from September like this one: “Juliette Lewis preps rock documentary on herself.” Exactly! But the articles back in September say she was aiming this film at Sundance 2012, something that has not come to pass, for good or for ill.
And a dishonorable mention must be made for the Casey Affleck-Joaquin Phoenix disaster I’m Still Here, which they first said was true, until it got an awful response, and then they said wasn’t true. When the nonfiction part begins to fade from nonfiction film, I am given pause.
Documentary film has given stars, who might have spent their time trying to get attention in other ways, a new avenue. No one says documentaries have to be completely objective, but can Ethel do anything but forward the Kennedy legacy? Will Something from Nothing, with its roadmap title, tell anything but rags-to-riches stories that positions rap, and rappers, in a favorable light? Maybe we’ll be surprised.
Get more documentary film news and features: Subscribe to POV’s documentary blog, like POV on Facebook or follow us on Twitter @povdocs.


































